ArticleScientific data2025
Gap-Filling for Daily Latent Heat Flux Observations with the Full-factorial method at Global Flux Sites.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gap-Filling for Daily Latent Heat Flux Observations with the Full-factorial method at Global Flux Sites.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Latent heat flux (LE) plays a crucial role in the water-energy cycle. Eddy covariance (EC) measurements of LE frequently suffer from data gaps due to weather or equipment malfunctions. This study presents a novel framework combining median-adjusted full-factorial and iterative methods to fill LE data gaps. The findings indicate that the framework exhibits stable gap-filling across land surfaces, showing RMSEs of 14.69-19.51 W/m
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.