ArticleCell death & disease2025
MET signaling drives acquired resistance to erdafitinib in muscle-invasive bladder cancer cells.
Article in Cell death & disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interlayer-confined redox in Ti₃C₂Tₓ-MXene laminates: a reagent-free screen-printed platform for the detection of erdafitinib.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- FGFR signaling and apoptotic regulation in cancer: links to immune evasion, therapeutic resistance, and treatment re-engagement.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Application and challenges of smart responsive multifunctional nanoplatforms in integrated diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer and overcoming therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is an aggressive malignancy with high recurrence and poor survival, accounting for the majority of bladder cancer-related deaths. A subset of MIBC harbors FGFR1 amplification or overexpression, associated with increased proliferation and poor prognosis. Although the pan-FGFR inhibitor erdafitinib has demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with FGFR3/FGFR2 alterations, primarily in non-MIBC, its efficacy is limited by resistance and toxicity. Moreover, its effectiveness in FGFR1-driven MIBC remains unclear. To address this gap, we investigated erdafitinib response and resistance mechanisms in JMSU1 cells, a model of FGFR1-amplified MIBC. While erdafitinib initially suppressed tumor growth, prolonged treatment led to resistance, characterized by persistent activation of ERK, AKT, and STAT1 signaling pathways. Mechanistic studies identified MET activation, driven by MET gene amplification, as a key driver of resistance. Notably, exogenous hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) not only induced resistance but also accelerated the emergence of MET-amplified, HGF-independent subpopulations under drug pressure. We also identified SHP2 as a critical mediator of FGFR1-driven ERK activation in parental cells. In resistant cells, MET activation enhanced SHP2-ERK signaling through the adaptor protein GAB1, reinforcing the resistant phenotype. Combined inhibition of FGFR1 and MET significantly suppressed tumor growth in resistant cells. These findings establish MET amplification and GAB1-SHP2 signaling as central mediators of erdafitinib resistance in FGFR1-amplified MIBC and support dual FGFR1/MET targeting as a promising therapeutic strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.