Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315237›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Capturing atomic wetting dynamics in real time.

George T Tebbutt, Christopher S Allen, Anna Fabijańska, Barbara M Maciejewska, Nicole Grobert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

George T TebbuttDepartment of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5831-000X
Christopher S AllenDepartment of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6353-6000
Anna FabijańskaŁódź University of Technology, Institute of Applied Computer Science, Łódź, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0249-7247
Barbara M MaciejewskaDepartment of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nicole GrobertDepartment of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. nicole.grobert@materials.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8499-8749

Funding

Office of the Royal Society RSIF IF160009RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/R00661X/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/T5171811/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atomic-scale wetting governs material formation at the nanoscale but remains poorly understood under confinement, where classical capillarity models fail. The growth of metallic nanowires within multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) exemplifies this challenge, requiring precise control over wetting, nucleation, and vapour-phase condensation. Here we show that nanowire formation proceeds through a two-stage mechanism: curvature-driven nucleation at open tube ends followed by capillary-driven elongation sustained by continuous vapour condensation. Using in situ atomic-resolution transmission electron microscopy (ARTEM) coupled with a deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) capable of classifying liquid, solid and intermediate Sn

Identifiers

PMID41315237
PMCPMC12727699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.