Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315213›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Higher interglacial dust fluxes relative to glacial periods in southwestern North American deserts.

Spencer E Staley, Peter J Fawcett, R Scott Anderson, Matthew E Kirby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Spencer E StaleyDepartment of Earth & Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA. spencer.staley@dri.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2829-6869
Peter J FawcettDepartment of Earth & Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8133-9967
R Scott AndersonSchool of Earth and Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-4150
Matthew E KirbyDepartment of Geological Sciences, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lengthy and continuous dust flux records from the deserts of southwestern North America are needed to understand the long-term impacts of climate on dust emissions and the relative influence of regional versus intercontinental dust sources. Here, we perform a particle size end-member analysis of a ~230,000-year sediment record from Stoneman Lake, Arizona, USA, revealing the area directly downwind of this important dust source region is 1.2-10 times dustier during peak interglacial periods compared to glacial maxima. This contrasts with other global dust records and aligns with the region's distinctive dry interglacial and pluvial glacial climates. Our analyses indicate minimal deposition of intercontinental dust and suggest the primary driver of dustiness is regional fine sediment supply, governed by desert alluvial and fluvial system responses to climate change. On the other hand, changes in atmospheric circulation and factors affecting wet and dry fallout appear to exert little control on regional dust flux variability.

Identifiers

PMID41315213
PMCPMC12663173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.