Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315157›Full record

ArticleCVIR endovascular2025

Highlighting the increasing need for anaesthetic support in interventional radiology.

Jonathan Hanly, Hugo C Temperley, Christopher O'Loughlin, Niall O'Sullivan, Marliza O'Dwyer, Richard Sweeney, Nazia Kahn, Robert Craig, Kevin P Sheahan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CVIR endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jonathan HanlyDepartment of Radiology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Hugo C TemperleyDepartment of Radiology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. temperlh@tcd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9151-3431
Christopher O'LoughlinDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Children's Health Ireland (CHI) at Crumlin Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Niall O'SullivanDepartment of Radiology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Marliza O'DwyerDepartment of Radiology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Richard SweeneyDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Nazia KahnDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Robert CraigHospital NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, London, UK.
Kevin P SheahanDepartment of Radiology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe field of interventional radiology (IR) has witnessed rapid advancements, with an increasing emphasis on complex and high-risk procedures. Increasingly, new IR treatments are becoming both available and indicated for patients with complex comorbidities. As a result, anaesthetic expertise has become essential to ensure patient safety, optimise procedural outcomes, and manage perioperative complications. Despite this growing demand, dedicated anaesthetic teams in IR remain limited, which leads to concerns regarding patient safety and procedural efficiency.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, to identify studies published up to September 2024 that examined the expanding scope of IR, with a focus on the increasing need for anaesthetic support. This commentary draws on the existing literature to discuss the interaction between anaesthesia and interventional radiology, with particular attention to procedural sedation, pain management, and the care of high-risk patients. This commentary also evaluates workforce limitations, logistical challenges, and potential benefits of increased anaesthetic involvement in IR.

findingsExisting literature demonstrates the significant benefits of anaesthetic involvement in IR. The presence of an anaesthesiologist was associated with reduced procedural risks, enhanced patient satisfaction, and quicker postoperative recovery times. Despite these benefits, many IR departments remain under-resourced in terms of dedicated anaesthetic staff. Furthermore, training programmes for anaesthesiologists rarely focus on the unique demands of IR, creating a gap in specialist care. The growing complexity and risk associated with IR procedures underscore the need for expanded anaesthetic support in this field. Hospitals and healthcare systems should prioritise the integration of anaesthetic teams into IR, investing in specialist training and workforce expansion. Doing so can improve patient outcomes and the overall efficiency of IR procedures, reducing procedural risks, increasing patient satisfaction, and facilitating quicker postoperative recovery times.

Indexed as

Anaesthetic supportInterventional radiologyOn-call servicesPatient safetyWorkforce challenges

Identifiers

PMID41315157
PMCPMC12662969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.