ArticlePsychophysiology2025
Size Sound Symbolism Modulates Linguistic Processing: An ERP Study.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Size Sound Symbolism Modulates Linguistic Processing: An ERP Study.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The size of physical objects is systematically associated with specific speech sounds used to refer to these objects. This phenomenon, termed size sound symbolism, has been demonstrated with a number of different behavioral measures such as word rating or word selection tasks. Yet, there is little data on where and how such sound-symbolic associations come into play within the brain's cognitive processing hierarchy. In the present EEG study, we investigated whether the neural activation of associations based on size sound symbolism can be automatic by nature. Participants were presented with small or large novel visual objects (greebles), followed by small-sounding or large-sounding (containing the letter <i> or <a>) fictional greeble names. We found, in accordance with our hypotheses, that the processing of sound-symbolically congruent names, compared to incongruent names, elicited a reduced N400 ERP component, in particular with regard to the small greebles. An additional exploratory analysis revealed an effect of size sound symbolism also in a subsequent time window, capturing a late positive component. These findings were evident in the absence of any task demands or conscious awareness related to sound symbolism. We argue that the greebles' presentation entailed an automatic activation of sound-symbolically associated linguistic information, which in turn facilitated the subsequent linguistic processing of sound-symbolically matching input, followed by stronger engagement of memory functions. The present study thus demonstrates that size sound symbolism is an inherent component of the brain's information processing system rather than a product of deliberate decision or response mechanisms and that it thereby exerts a significant influence on how we experience the world around us.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.