ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Poor Oral HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Persistence in an Integrated PrEP/STI Program in Malawi.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The integration of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) into STI services can improve PrEP uptake among a population at elevated risk of acquiring HIV. The effectiveness of PrEP relies on ongoing coverage during periods of HIV risk, however, and little is known about longitudinal PrEP use among people accessing PrEP through STI clinics in sub-Saharan Africa. In this study, we analyzed routine records data from people who newly initiated PrEP at an STI clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi in March-December 2022. We assessed PrEP persistence among clients who received Malawi's standard-of-care PrEP services (n = 662) and reweighted the data to reflect the baseline distribution of age, sex, and PrEP indication among the full study population (n = 835). We used weighted generalized estimating equations to estimate the proportion of clients expected to persist on PrEP if all clients had received Malawi's standard-of-care services. We also assessed predictors of persistence and described re-engagement in PrEP among clients who did not persist. We estimated that, had all clients received standard-of-care services, 17% (95% CI: 14%, 20%), 7% (95% CI: 6%, 10%), and 4% (95% CI: 3%, 5%) would have persisted on PrEP at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively, and that 8% (95% CI: 5%, 11%) of those who did not persist on PrEP at 1 month would have re-engaged in PrEP services by 12 months. Persistence varied by age and PrEP indication. Our findings indicate very low PrEP persistence in this population and suggest opportunities to support ongoing PrEP use in settings with integrated PrEP/STI services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.