ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Practice patterns in the evaluation and management of urinary incontinence following anatomic endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP): results from a global survey.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess global practice patterns in the evaluation and management of urinary incontinence (UI) following Anatomical Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate (AEEP), a procedure increasingly used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive 40-question web-based survey was distributed globally to practicing urologists with experience in AEEP. The survey captured information on surgeon demographics, surgical techniques, postoperative care, diagnostic approaches, treatment strategies, and patient counseling. Data collection occurred between April 21 and May 10, 2025. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses were performed to identify trends and associations. REUSLTS: A total of 97 valid responses were analyzed, with the majority of respondents based in North America (36%), Europe (34%), and Asia (10.3%). Most had 1–5 years of AEEP experience (51.5%) and performed over 200 procedures (43.3%). Holmium laser was the most common energy source (65.9%), and 57.7% preferred en bloc enucleation. Urge incontinence (56.7%) was most prevalent, followed by mixed (43.3%) and stress incontinence (33%). First-line treatment for UI included pelvic floor muscle training (68%), with pharmacological management using anticholinergics primarily for urge UI. Surgical intervention was typically reserved for persistent symptoms beyond 6 months. Notably, 79.4% of respondents practiced apical mucosal preservation.
conclusionsThis global survey reveals significant variability in post-AEEP incontinence management, driven by differences in experience, resources, patient demographics, and regional practices. Although conservative treatment predominates, structured preoperative and postoperative protocols- including early pelvic floor training and judicious use of diagnostics- are underutilized. These findings underscore the need for evidence-based guidelines to optimize outcomes and reduce the burden of post-AEEP incontinence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41315059What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.