ArticleScientific reports2025
Generated stresses finite element analysis of restored endodontically treated molar using single versus double titanium posts : Abbreviated title: generated stresses finite element analysis of restored endodontically treated molar.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When teeth are extensively injured, the restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth (ETT) presents substantial obstacles. For these restorations to be successful over the long term, it is essential to ensure appropriate retention and resistance to fracture. The purpose of this study is to use 3D finite element analysis (FEA) to assess the stress distribution in severely damaged ETT following the installation of single versus double titanium posts. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to scan an undamaged human mandibular first molar. Three post designs were examined; Model D received one distal post, Model DMB had two posts; distal and mesiobuccal posts, and Model DML included two posts; distal and mesiolingual posts. FEA was used to examine stress distribution and evaluate maximum stress at six areas: occlusal surface, finish line, furcation area, and along the root canal length at 7 mm, 5 mm, and 3 mm from the apex. Model D recorded the highest stress values at all assessed locations, while Model DML reported the least stress values. Model DMB showed intermediate levels of stress. When compared to a single post, the use of two posts considerably reduced stress concentrations, especially when inserted in the distal and mesiolingual canals. FEA proved to be a useful tool in evaluating and directing clinical decisions for repairing ETT. Occlusal surface followed by finish line locations reported the highest stress values in all tested models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.