ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
Categorizing immunotherapy resistance mechanisms in non-small cell lung cancer: how can we perform better?
Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A two-gene prognostic model for lung adenocarcinoma using summary-data-based Mendelian randomization analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression.Future science OA · 2026Article
- Guiding the Application of Immunotherapy in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: The Role of Biomarkers.Thoracic cancer · 2026Review
- PGE2-mediated NK cell reprogramming drives acquired immunotherapy resistance in lung adenocarcinoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- TIM-3 in AML: pathogenic roles and therapeutic targetability.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Prognostic significance of continuing immunotherapy beyond progression in unresectable lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Tumor-associated neutrophils in lung adenocarcinoma: from mechanisms to therapeutic targeting.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has revolutionized the treatment of many solid tumors including advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable driver alterations. Unfortunately, the majority of patients with NSCLC do not respond to ICI treatment or will eventually experience disease progression. A wide variety of resistance mechanisms is hypothesized as responsible for tumor immune escape. Also, at what stage they interfere in the anticancer immune response, and the possible complex interactions or overlap between these resistance mechanisms complicate the matter further. Although progress has been made, our current understanding of the resistance mechanisms underlying the failure of ICI treatment is still limited. This is reflected in the lack of positive phase III clinical trials for second-line treatment after failure of ICI in advanced NSCLC. This might be the result of inadequate patient selection. Here, we summarize the current available data on resistance mechanisms in NSCLC and propose a classification system to categorize patients based on resistance mechanisms present. By doing so, we could guide preclinical research and improve selection of patients for clinical trials, thereby ultimately improving outcomes for patients with advanced NSCLC who have progressed on ICI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.