ArticleBMJ open2025
Comparison of spinal versus general anaesthesia in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06982690 (Impact of Anesthesia Modality on Recurrence and Progression in High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Anesthesia Modality on Recurrence and Progression in High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Spinal Versus General Anesthesia
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe impact of anaesthesia modality on oncological outcomes in patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains uncertain. Emerging evidence suggests that anaesthetic agents and techniques may influence tumour biology and recurrence through immunomodulatory and neuroendocrine pathways. However, prospective randomised trials comparing spinal and general anaesthesia in this population are lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre, prospective, parallel-arm randomised controlled trial will enrol 370 patients with clinically suspected high-risk NMIBC undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumour. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive either spinal or general anaesthesia. The primary endpoint is time to recurrence over a 104-week follow-up period. Secondary endpoints include time to progression, ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Recruitment has not yet started. It is expected to begin in December 2025 and to be completed by June 2029. The planned follow-up period for each participant is 104 weeks. This manuscript is based on protocol V.1.0, dated March 2025. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06982690.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.