ArticleBMJ open2025
Insights into antimicrobial resistance awareness among Sri Lankan medical practitioners: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this study was to explore medical practitioners' understanding of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and its aspects, such as its causes, possible outcomes and how doctors can contribute to its prevention. DESIGN AND
settingThis qualitative study was conducted in Sri Lankan healthcare settings.
participantsUsing convenience sampling, the study included allopathic medical practitioners aged 18-60 years, excluding intern-medical officers, until data saturation.
interventionOne-on-one interviews were conducted online or in person, depending on each participant's preference. A structured questionnaire was used to triangulate the information.
resultsData were categorised into four: (1) understanding, awareness and identifying AMR as an issue among medical practitioners, (2) knowledge and understanding of factors that contribute to AMR development among medical practitioners, (3) knowledge and understanding of the outcome of AMR and (4) knowledge and understanding of preventive measures against AMR among medical officers. Interviewees showed an awareness of AMR; however, their knowledge was not up to date. Key reasons for inappropriate antibiotic use included unavailability and poor quality of antibiotics and unawareness of updated guidelines, especially in the government sector. In the private sector, patient pressure, the need to attract patients and the high cost of investigations contributed to misuse. Additionally, low patient literacy about AMR was a significant factor.
conclusionThis study revealed that although medical practitioners in Sri Lanka are aware of AMR, their knowledge remains limited in certain areas. Several challenges contributed to inappropriate antibiotic use, including the availability and quality of antibiotics, external pressures from patients and financial constraints. The findings of this study highlight the urgent need for continuous medical education and public awareness campaigns to improve both practitioner and patient understanding of AMR. Addressing these issues is essential for effectively preventing and managing AMR in healthcare settings in Sri Lanka.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.