Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41314827›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Conventional and tablet-supported physical training to reduce falls and fall-related injuries in community-dwelling older adults: protocol of the randomised SURE-footed into the future Fall Intervention Trial (SURE-FIT).

Daniel Schoene, Michaela Gross, Benjamin Finger, Nils Axel Lahmann, Kathrin Raeder, Susan Vorwerg-Gall, Hans-Helmut König, Thomas Grochtdreis, Daniel Stöger, Alexander Handschuh and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Daniel SchoeneDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, Robert Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany daniel.schoene@rbk.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0717-5746
Michaela GrossDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, Robert Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Benjamin FingerDepartment of Telemedicine, Robert Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Nils Axel LahmannDepartment of Geriatrics and Medical Gerontology, Geriatrics Research Group, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Kathrin RaederDepartment of Geriatrics and Medical Gerontology, Geriatrics Research Group, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Susan Vorwerg-GallDepartment of Geriatrics and Medical Gerontology, Geriatrics Research Group, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hans-Helmut KönigDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5711-6862
Thomas GrochtdreisDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0176-7989
Daniel StögerSocial Insurance for Agriculture, Forestry, and Horticulture, Kassel, Germany.
Alexander HandschuhGerman Association of Cities and Municipalities, Berlin, Germany.
Theresa UnseldInstitute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Dietrich RothenbacherInstitute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Gisela BücheleInstitute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Kilian RappDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, Robert Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExercise-based interventions are well-established in reducing falls and fall-related injuries, but adherence and accessibility remain key challenges, particularly in rural areas. While conventional in-person training is widely used, digital interventions may offer scalable solutions to enhance engagement and reach. However, pragmatic trials evaluating the real-world effectiveness of conventional and digitally supported fall prevention interventions are lacking, limiting the evidence base for their implementation in routine healthcare settings. The SURE-Footed into the Future Fall Intervention Trial (SURE-FIT) aims to compare the effectiveness of two structured fall prevention interventions-a conventional centre-based exercise programme and a hybrid telemedical programme combining in-person and tablet-supported training-against a wait-list control group in reducing falls and fall-related injuries among community-dwelling older adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a pragmatic three-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled superiority trial with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio. Participants (≥65 years, community-dwelling, planned n=2778) will be randomly assigned to (1) conventional centre-based training supplemented with printed materials for home-based continuation (conventional group), (2) a hybrid model integrating centre-based and tablet-supported training for continuation (tablet group) or (3) a wait-list control group. The intervention includes a 9-week supervised phase followed by 43 weeks of independent home-based training. The primary outcomes are the incidence rate of falls and fall-related injuries over 12 months. Secondary outcomes include physical functioning, physical activity, concerns about falling, loneliness and the risk of low protein intake. A process evaluation will assess intervention feasibility and implementation. Additionally, qualitative interviews will be conducted with participants, course instructors and municipal stakeholders to explore experiences, facilitators and challenges related to programme participation and implementation. A health-economic evaluation will be conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of the structured fall prevention interventions. Data collection will take place at baseline and every 3 months via standardised questionnaires, with a subgroup undergoing physical performance testing and sensor-based activity monitoring. Analyses will follow an intention-to-treat approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the Ethics Committee of Ulm University (271/23). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrolment. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and national fall prevention initiatives. Additionally, results will be shared with key municipal representatives, and the German National Association of Senior Citizens' Organisations (BAGSO). A publicly accessible website will provide ongoing access to study information and findings in plain language. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00032878, German Clinical Trials Register.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsComputers, HandheldExercise TherapyWounds and InjuriesAgedEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMalePragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicTelemedicineaccidental fallsAgedcommunity-dwellingExercisefall preventionfunctional capacitymobilityPREVENTIVE MEDICINETelemedicineTrauma

Identifiers

PMID41314827
PMCPMC12666044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.