ArticleBMJ open2025
From knowledge to action: protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation of First Nations-led knowledge mobilisation on prenatal opioid exposure.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFirst Nations communities in Canada are disproportionately impacted by prenatal opioid exposure (POE) and neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). In response, we developed a research partnership with 13 First Nations communities in Ontario. Phase I of the research project, initiated in 2018, included the development of mixed-methods reports on the impact of POE for each community. This protocol outlines the evaluation of phase II, during which nine communities individually co-designed and implemented community-specific knowledge mobilisation (KMb) plans informed by findings from phase I. The evaluation aims to assess advisory working group engagement, KMb implementation and perceived community-level impacts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This mixed-methods evaluation integrates survey and qualitative data to assess First Nations-led KMb products and activities. The Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool, a validated survey instrument, will be administered to advisory group members and analysed descriptively. Focus groups and interviews will be conducted to explore advisory working group members' experiences and analysed using phenomenological methods. Qualitative findings will be mapped to the Engage with Impact framework to assess outcomes across engagement domains. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted by Vancouver Island University. All community contacts and advisory working group members will provide informed consent prior to data collection. Phase II activities are governed by formal community agreements. In alignment with First Nations Principles of OCAP (Ownership, Control, Access and Possession), First Nations community partners retain ownership of their KMb products and are actively involved in the design, implementation and dissemination of the project evaluation. Results will be shared through peer-reviewed publications, community reports and knowledge-sharing events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.