SynthesisBMJ open2025
Folate exposures and risk of colorectal cancer: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut microbiome derived folate metabolite suppresses colorectal cancer progression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Folate as a Key Regulator of Animal Intestinal Homeostasis: From Metabolism to Microbiota and Barrier Function.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Obesity, Bariatric Surgery, and Cancer Risk: Nutritional Perspectives and Long-Term Clinical Implications.Nutrients · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo systematically summarise and evaluate the existing evidence of the associations between diverse folate exposures and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), while identifying evidence quality.
designUmbrella review of meta-analyses. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and Embase were searched from the database inception to March 2024, with an update to 12 October 2025. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials or observational studies that investigated the associations between folate exposures and CRC or precancerous lesions (ie, adenoma and polyps). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: For each association, we recalculated the summary effect size with 95% CI using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model, heterogeneity (
resultsThis umbrella review included five meta-analyses describing 10 associations between folate exposures and CRC risk. In the general population, moderate-quality evidence supported an inverse association between total folate intake (from foods and supplements) and CRC risk (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.90), while low-quality evidence suggested inverse associations of dietary folate intake (from foods alone) (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96) and folic acid supplement intake (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.77 to 0.90) with CRC risk. Among patients with inflammatory bowel disease, low-quality evidence suggested an inverse association between folic acid supplement intake and CRC incidence (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.96). Additionally, elevated circulating folate levels were observed to have a provoking effect on advanced-stage tumours (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.18 to 3.22; Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE): very low). Sensitivity analysis revealed a potential increased risk of adenoma recurrence associated with folic acid supplement use among patients with a history of adenoma (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.29; GRADE: high).
conclusionsThese findings suggest that consuming dietary folate and total folate intake may be beneficial in CRC primary prevention. Specifically, folic acid supplements may inhibit colorectal carcinogenesis in normal tissues while promoting cancer in the established neoplastic foci. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024537550.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.