ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026
Women's real-time pain and stress during medical abortion: An ecological momentary assessment study.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Women's real-time pain and stress during medical abortion: An ecological momentary assessment study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionKnowledge on women's pain and stress experiences during medical abortion is scarce and evidence mainly relies on retrospective reports, which are prone to recall bias. Hence, our objective was to study real-time self-reported pain and stress throughout the medical abortion process, their fluctuation over time, and to examine whether age, parity, gestational age, adverse childhood events (ACE), and contextual factors (e.g., analgesics intake, bleeding) were associated with pain and stress. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis one-group, single center, exploratory cohort study (conducted 2020-2023) used ecological momentary assessment (EMA). A population-based sample of women ≥18 years of age presenting for first trimester medical abortion at ≤9th week of gestation was approached after mifepristone intake. Sixty women aged 30.40 ± 6.61 years were included in this study. EMA commenced with mifepristone intake and entailed four prompts per day over a consecutive 7-day period. Main outcomes included self-reported pain and stress measured using visual analog scales (VAS). Secondary outcomes were clinical and demographic data as well as psychological measures. Data were analyzed using multilevel models.
resultsReported pain and stress varied not only throughout the abortion process but also between women, showing an increase on Day 3 (misoprostol intake) and a gradual decrease thereafter. While age, gestational age, and parity were not significantly related to pain, higher self-reported stress, more bleeding, more analgesic intake, and a higher number of ACEs were associated with higher pain levels. Higher stress levels, in turn, were associated with more ACEs, parity, analgesics intake, treatment-related events, and weekdays.
conclusionsOur results highlight large interindividual variations in women's pain and stress experiences during first trimester medical abortion and thus emphasize the need for individualized counseling and pain treatment. Screening for ACEs, along with using event-based EMA protocols for future pain-management research, may promote tailored care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.