Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41314688›Full record

ReviewOpen heart2025

Feasibility of screening for heart failure in Africa: barriers and facilitators in a low-resourced setting.

Neusa Jessen, Albertino Damasceno, Pardeep Jhund

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neusa JessenDepartment of Medicine, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique neusa.jessen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6304-7557
Albertino DamascenoDepartment of Medicine, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique.
Pardeep JhundBHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is of worldwide public health concern, yet with higher morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries compared with high-income nations, posing a significant burden to the already overstrained and unprepared health systems in many countries.In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), while community level data is sparse, a number of hospital-based HF studies have been conducted, highlighting the distinct presentation of HF when compared with data from other regions of the world. It is imperative that more data on the precise nature of HF in Africa are obtained, but multiple barriers exist to obtaining reliable data. In the present commentary, we discuss characteristics of HF in Africa, their potential impact on conducting screening studies at the community level and describe the strategies that we have incorporated in the MAPUTO-HF (The Maputo Antecedents, Prevalence and Urban Transition Of Heart Failure Project: feasibility of a population-based study in a low-resource African setting) study, a feasibility study that was designed to overcome these barriers and facilitate HF research in SSA in both a rural and urban setting.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth ResourcesHeart FailureMass ScreeningAfricaAfrica South of the SaharaFeasibility StudiesHumansPrevalenceEpidemiologyHeart FailureRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41314688
PMCPMC12666165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.