ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Collaborative Working to Address Inappropriate ED Attendances by Nursing Home Residents.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncrease in life expectancy in Ireland and social isolation has led to an increasing number of people living in residential care facilities (RCFs). Residents are frequently transferred to emergency departments (ED) for a variety of reasons. Studies found that up to 40% of these hospital admissions were deemed inappropriate. An inappropriate admission in previous studies has been defined as a situation in which care in lower cost settings would be as safe and less disruptive than care in higher cost hospital settings.
methodsA review of a convenience sample of ED attendances to University Hospital Kerry (UHK) found that 50% were inappropriate. A SMART aim in a quality improvement project (QIP) is an aim which is Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time based. The SMART aim of this QIP was to reduce the number of persons residing in RCFs, being inappropriately referred to UHK, from 50% to 30% from March 2024 to May 2025.Quality improvement (QI) measures included the standardisation of terminology through the workings of the palliative frailty multidisciplinary team, development of a communication document on resuscitation status and treatment escalation preferences, and the implementation of an advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) palliative care service for RCFs supported by a palliative medicine physician. Education was integral in this QIP.
resultsQI measures resulted in a reduction in monthly ED attendances of RCF residents from a median of 82 to 50. Inappropriate attendances reduced from 50% to 31%. Stakeholders' feedback on the new service was overwhelmingly positive. The project resulted in financial savings for the health service.
conclusionIntegration of the geriatric and palliative medicine services with staff of RCFs allowed for sharing of knowledge, standardisation of terminology and development of alternative models of care and pathways to access specialties. The introduction of a designated ANP palliative care service for RCFs has been essential in helping residents to receive the right care, in the right place, at the right time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.