ArticleKorean journal of radiology2025
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Asia: 2025 Status Update.
Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating guideline adherence in LLM studies using LLMs.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Radiology Research and Publishing Across 2025-2026: Perspectives FromKorean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- The Evolving Landscape of Cardiac Radiology in Asia.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the current status of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) practice across Asian regions, guiding future clinical advancements and academic collaboration in CMR. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis descriptive, cross-sectional study is based on presentations from the "Current Status of CMR in Asia" session at the 2025 Asian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging congress held on June 14. Data from nine Asian regions-including China (Mainland), Chinese Taipei, Hong Kong (China), India, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Thailand, and Vietnam (listed in alphabetical order)-were collected via structured surveys or general overviews, addressing institutional characteristics, technical infrastructure, clinical applications, and research activity. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.
resultsCMR scan volumes varied widely across Asia, with high-volume centers reporting from fewer than 100 scans per month to over 20,000 scans per year. Cardiomyopathy and ischemic heart disease were the most common clinical indications, while congenital heart disease or heart failure were also important in some regions. CMR supervision differed by region, with procedures overseen by either radiologists or cardiologists. Key barriers to clinical utilization included high costs, limited scanner availability, and a shortage of trained personnel. Common research obstacles included low scan volumes, inadequate funding, and the absence of multicenter networks.
conclusionThis study highlights the need for coordinated efforts to improve scanner access, enhance workforce training, and foster multiregional collaboration to ensure the sustainable growth of CMR practice and research across Asia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.