Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41314643›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2025

Evaluation of an AI-Based Chatbot Providing Real-Time Feedback in Communication Training for Mental Health Care Professionals: Proof-of-Concept Observational Study.

Lea Herschbach, Teresa Festl-Wietek, Christian Stegemann-Philipps, Alessandra Sonanini, Bernd Herrmann, Rebecca Erschens, Anne Herrmann-Werner, Friederike Holderried

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lea HerschbachTIME - Tuebingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6378-5073
Teresa Festl-WietekTIME - Tuebingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1450-1757
Christian Stegemann-PhilippsTIME - Tuebingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8122-5724
Alessandra SonaniniTIME - Tuebingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4893-3989
Bernd HerrmannTIME - Tuebingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1851-8746
Rebecca ErschensDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4433-9378
Anne Herrmann-WernerTIME - Tuebingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2413-7047
Friederike HolderriedTIME - Tuebingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1828-0920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective communication is essential in medical practice, especially in dealing with the increasing number of patients presenting with mental health conditions. Feedback plays a crucial role in improving communication skills but is often difficult to implement. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based tools offer promising support for practicing and improving communication techniques among physicians.

objectiveThis proof-of-concept study investigated the capability of an AI-based chatbot that provided physicians with real-time feedback to train communication techniques. Specifically, it addressed three research questions: (1) How accurate is the AI-generated feedback, and how is it perceived by participants? (2) Does the use of an AI-based chatbot and AI-generated feedback lead to an increased frequency in the use of specific communication techniques? (3) Do physicians perceive the training with the AI-based chatbot and AI-generated feedback as beneficial for their daily clinical practice?

methodsThe study used a proof-of-concept design using 56 anonymized chat transcripts between physicians and simulated patients. Participating physicians received automated feedback generated by the AI-based chatbot, which was designed to assess and encourage the use of specific communication techniques. Feedback accuracy and user perception were evaluated, and changes in communication behavior were assessed. Finally, participants completed a postintervention questionnaire to evaluate perceived benefits for clinical practice.

resultsThe AI-generated feedback was found to be very accurate with 85.38% of the real-time feedback being partially or even totally correct. In addition, most of the participants considered the feedback accurate, with 83.64% (n=55) agreeing or totally agreeing. Furthermore, 87.27% (n=55) of the participants agreed or totally agreed to the fact that the feedback was helpful. It also appeared to support the repeated use of recommended communication techniques. Furthermore, most of the participants agreed that practicing with an AI-based chatbot helped them practice and apply new communication techniques in clinical interactions, improved their physician-patient communication, and helped them recognize mental health conditions better in everyday medical practice.

conclusionsThe results highlight the potential of AI-supported training to address key communication challenges in medicine, particularly in the context of mental health care. The combination of real-time practice and immediate feedback may foster sustained improvements in physician-patient interactions. Integrating such tools into medical education could offer a valuable complement to traditional training methods. Future research may aim to refine AI models to improve their reliability and investigate the long-term effects and objective measures.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCommunicationHealth PersonnelAdultFeedbackFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMalePhysician-Patient RelationsProof of Concept Studyartificial intelligenceclinical competencecommunicationfeedbackmedical educationphysician-patient relationssimulated patients

Identifiers

PMID41314643
PMCPMC12701347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.