Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41313793›Full record

ArticleNursing inquiry2026

The Sounds of Silence: Problematizing Voicelessness in Nursing Practice.

Lori L Rietze, Mary Ellen Purkis, Kelli I Stajduhar, Denise S Cloutier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lori L RietzeLaurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4067-4875
Mary Ellen PurkisUniversity of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7138-2849
Kelli I StajduharUniversity of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2381-4712
Denise S CloutierUniversity of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-5234

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A positive healthcare environment and effective nurse recruitment are widely recognized as interconnected factors that improve outcomes for patients, families, and staff. Despite this, frontline nurses and their managers often have conflicting views on workplace issues. Although some hospitals have implemented "speak-up" initiatives, nurses in acute care settings still feel silenced, as interventions designed to improve workplace culture have had limited long-term impact. This underscores the need for a deeper understanding of how nurses are silenced. This qualitative, ethnographic study aimed to improve our understanding of how nurses are silenced in the acute care workplace. Through semi-structured interviews with registered nurses (n = 14) and administrators (n = 9), observational field notes (20 h), and documents (n = 8), we found that although nurses used various channels to voice concerns about patient safety, patient-centered care, and workplace health to their managers, they still felt ignored and unsupported, leading to feelings of vulnerability, anger, and abandonment. Administrators understood staff frustrations but felt powerless, seeing themselves as conduits for top-down directives rather than active participants in organizational initiatives. These findings offer crucial insights for clinicians, researchers, educators, and administrators aiming to create a more inclusive culture that prioritizes collaboration and high-quality care.

Indexed as

NursesWorkplaceAdultAnthropology, CulturalAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleOrganizational CultureQualitative Researchacute careagencyemployeeorganizationalregistered nursesilencingvoice

Identifiers

PMID41313793
PMCPMC12662626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.