ArticleNursing inquiry2026
The Sounds of Silence: Problematizing Voicelessness in Nursing Practice.
Article in Nursing inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Disciplined Body: A Genealogy of Naturalized Discipline in Nursing Education.Nursing inquiry · 2026Article
- The Mediating Role of Organizational Silence in the Relationship Between Change Fatigue and Work Engagement Among Chinese Clinical Nurses.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- The Sounds of Silence: Problematizing Voicelessness in Nursing Practice.Nursing inquiry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A positive healthcare environment and effective nurse recruitment are widely recognized as interconnected factors that improve outcomes for patients, families, and staff. Despite this, frontline nurses and their managers often have conflicting views on workplace issues. Although some hospitals have implemented "speak-up" initiatives, nurses in acute care settings still feel silenced, as interventions designed to improve workplace culture have had limited long-term impact. This underscores the need for a deeper understanding of how nurses are silenced. This qualitative, ethnographic study aimed to improve our understanding of how nurses are silenced in the acute care workplace. Through semi-structured interviews with registered nurses (n = 14) and administrators (n = 9), observational field notes (20 h), and documents (n = 8), we found that although nurses used various channels to voice concerns about patient safety, patient-centered care, and workplace health to their managers, they still felt ignored and unsupported, leading to feelings of vulnerability, anger, and abandonment. Administrators understood staff frustrations but felt powerless, seeing themselves as conduits for top-down directives rather than active participants in organizational initiatives. These findings offer crucial insights for clinicians, researchers, educators, and administrators aiming to create a more inclusive culture that prioritizes collaboration and high-quality care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.