Trial reportUnited European gastroenterology journal2026
Patient-Reported-Outcome-Measures (PROMs) After Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Resections.
Trial report in United European gastroenterology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient-Reported-Outcome-Measures (PROMs) After Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Resections.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundData on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of patients undergoing endoscopic resections have been sparse. The aim of our study was the prospective assessment of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) as a baseline and post-endoscopic resection (ER) measurement in patients with epithelial mucosal neoplasms, adenomas and superficial tumours in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract.
methodsThe study was designed as a prospective single-centre clinical trial. The applied GIQLI consists of 36 items, which are questions assessing symptoms, emotional facts, and the physical and social status of the patient. A baseline assessment and subsequent follow-up after ER were conducted. The ER consisted of EMR, ESD and EFTR techniques following the guidelines.
resultsOf 347 enroled patients, 238 with an indication for ER were analysed. Prior to the procedure, the GIQLI was at 112.74 ± 20.6, which increased after 4-6 weeks to 115.70 ± 20.6 (p < 0.0001, paired t-test). The improvement of PROMs was due to a highly significant rise in the emotional dimension and to some extent by the improvement of the GI-symptom dimension. DISCUSSION: This prospective study on PROMs shows a significant improvement in quality of life following endoscopic resection. This appears to be related to a decrease in troublesome symptoms and emotional burden after ER. Further studies are necessary to determine whether the choice of specific endoscopic procedures can have a significant impact on the decision-making process in individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.