Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41313605›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025

A comprehensive benchmarking of the AlphaFold3 for predicting biomacromolecules and their interactions.

Chunxiang Peng, Wentao Ni, Quancheng Liu, Gang Hu, Wei Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A simple probabilistic AlphaFold interaction score.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chunxiang PengDepartment of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan, 1136 Catherine Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1085, United States.
Wentao NiNITFID, School of Statistics and Data Science, AAIS, LPMC and KLMDASR, Nankai University, 94 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300071, China.
Quancheng LiuGilbert S Omenn Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, 100 Washtenaw Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2218, United States.
Gang HuNITFID, School of Statistics and Data Science, AAIS, LPMC and KLMDASR, Nankai University, 94 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300071, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7134-3380
Wei ZhengNITFID, School of Statistics and Data Science, AAIS, LPMC and KLMDASR, Nankai University, 94 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300071, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2984-9003

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 054-63253109National Natural Science Foundation of China 12326611National Natural Science Foundation of China 12426303National Natural Science Foundation of China 92370128Tianjin Science and Technology Program 24ZXZSSS00320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning has significantly enhanced protein structure prediction, and AlphaFold2 marked a particular milestone among these methods for predicting protein monomer and complex structures. The AlphaFold3 represents a pivotal further advancement in biomolecular structure prediction, extending beyond proteins to model diverse assemblies. Despite attracting a huge number of users, there is still an absence of third-party benchmarks to fairly demonstrate the performance of the AlphaFold3. In this work, we benchmark AlphaFold3's performance across nine datasets, protein monomers, orphan proteins, alternative conformations, protein multimers, peptide-protein complexes, antigen-antibody complexes, RNA, RNA multimers, and protein-nucleic acid complexes, compared to AlphaFold2, AlphaFold-Multimer, and RoseTTAFoldNA, RhoFold+, NuFold and trRosettaRNA. For protein monomers, AlphaFold3 demonstrates improved local structural accuracy over AlphaFold2, though global accuracy gains are limited. In modeling general protein complexes, AlphaFold3 surpasses AlphaFold-Multimer in local structural prediction. For peptide-protein complexes, their performances are nearly indistinguishable, whereas on antigen-antibody complexes, AlphaFold3 is significantly superior. AlphaFold3 shows substantial superiority over RoseTTAFoldNA in protein-nucleic acid predictions, with significant gains in TM-score, local distance difference test scores, and interaction network fidelity scores, whereas for RNA multimers its advantage is limited to significant gains in local distance difference test scores. For RNA monomers, trRosettaRNA achieves higher global prediction accuracy. These results highlight AlphaFold3's ability to predict both structural detail and interactions, positioning it as a versatile tool for diverse biomolecular systems and suggesting promising applications in structural biology and molecular interaction research, while at the same time highlighting areas ripe for continuing improvements in performance.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMacromolecular SubstancesProteinsSoftwareBenchmarkingDatabases, ProteinModels, MolecularProtein ConformationRNAMacromolecular SubstancesProteinsRNAprotein complex structure predictionprotein-nucleic acid complex structure predictionprotein structure predictionRNA multimer structure predictionRNA structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID41313605
PMCPMC12661943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.