ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Localization of macromolecules in crowded cellular cryo-electron tomograms from extremely sparse labels.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Localizing macromolecules in crowded cellular cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) images or tomograms is crucial for determining their in situ structures. Traditional template matching-based approaches for this task suffer from template-specific biases and have low throughput. Given these problems, learning-based solutions are necessary. However, the paucity of annotated data for training poses substantial challenges for such learning-based methods. Moreover, preparing extensively annotated cellular tomograms for training macromolecule localization methods is extremely time-consuming and burdensome due to the large volume and low signal-to-noise ratio of the tomograms. In this work, we developed TomoPicker, an annotation-efficient macromolecule localization method for tomograms. To achieve such annotation-efficiency, TomoPicker regards macromolecule localization as a voxel classification problem and solves it with two different positive-unlabeled learning approaches. We evaluated TomoPicker on two experimental cryo-ET datasets of crowded eukaryotic cells and one experimental dataset of relatively less crowded prokaryotic cell. We observed that, with only 10 annotated macromolecule locations, TomoPicker with positive unlabeled learning achieved a performance comparable to that of state-of-the-art supervised methods trained with several hundred annotations. In other words, TomoPicker achieved plausible segmentation with up to 98% less data compared with supervised learning-based methods. Furthermore, it demonstrated substantial improvements over existing learning-based macromolecule localization methods under sparse annotation scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.