ArticleMikrochimica acta2025
Efficient thin-film microextraction of selected pesticides from fruit samples: utilizing MXene@UiO-66-NH
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The design and fabrication of a novel MXene@UiO-66-NH2 composite immobilized on a cellulose support is presented. The prepared MXene@UiO-66-NH2-cellulose film has been utilized as an efficient platform for the simultaneous thin-film microextraction (TFME) of tebuconazole and bensulfuron-methyl in selected real fruit samples, including nectarine, pear, tangerine, and watermelon. The hybrid sorbent combines the high surface area and tunable porosity of UiO-66-NH2 with the layered structure and abundant surface functionalities of MXene, resulting in enhanced surface area (301.25 m2g− 1) and tunable porosity. Under optimized extraction condition, the proposed method exhibited excellent analytical performance, including low limits of detection (LODs: 0.02–0.03 µg L− 1) and limits of quantification (LOQs: 0.07–0.09 µg L− 1), wide linear dynamic ranges (LDRs: 0.10–100.00 µg L− 1, coefficient of determination (R²) >0.9973), and acceptable enrichment factors (EFs: 43.5–60.4). The method also showed outstanding precision (relative standard deviations (%RSDs): 2.6–6.4%) and absolute recoveries (ARs: 36.2–50.3%) across all tested matrices, confirming reliable extraction of trace-level pesticide residues. To assess sustainability, the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) and Analytical Greenness Metric for Sample Preparation (AGREEprep) were applied, yielding scores of 82.50 and 0.74, respectively. These results highlight the method’s environmental compatibility and practical applicability. Compared with existing MXene-based sorbents, the developed TFME platform demonstrated superior extraction efficiency and reusability, emphasizing its potential for routine food safety monitoring and environmental residue analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41313475What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.