Exploring the microcystin-LR degrading potential of a bacterial consortium obtained from abattoir effluents.

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thabile LukheleInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability (iNanoWS), College of Science Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, UNISA Science Campus, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9166-9396

Titus A M MsagatiInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability (iNanoWS), College of Science Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, UNISA Science Campus, Johannesburg, South Africa. msagatam@unisa.ac.za.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of microcystins in freshwater bodies is a global concern as they pose possible health effects on aquatic life, humans, wildlife and livestock. In a continued drive to find technologies for their safe removal from water, biodegradation has been identified as one of the effective, low cost and safe technologies. Using classic batch culture experiments, this work identified a bacterial consortium obtained from abattoir effluents, that could metabolize microcystin-LR (MC-LR) as the sole source of carbon. After 21 days of incubation the MC-LR concentrations (3 mg L

Indexed as

AbattoirsBacteriaMicrobial ConsortiaMicrocystinsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalMarine ToxinsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16Scyanoginosin LRMarine ToxinsMicrocystinsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAbattoir effluentsBacterial consortiumMetabolic diversityMicrocystin degradation

Identifiers

PMID41313433

DOI10.3390/w17060774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.