Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41313415›Full record

ArticleHistory and philosophy of the life sciences2025

Physical explanations in evolutionary biology.

Margarida Hermida, James Ladyman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in History and philosophy of the life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Margarida HermidaPhilosophy Department GW, University of Salzburg, Franziskanergasse 1, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. margarida.hermida@plus.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0259-109X
James LadymanDepartment of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Cotham House, Bristol, BS6 6JL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The consensus in philosophy of biology seems to be that although nothing in biological systems is strictly incompatible with physical laws, biology is to a very great extent autonomous from physics. The main thesis of this paper is that, although biology is autonomous from the physical sciences in several ways, it is not explanatorily independent from physics. Physical explanations are pervasive and important in biology, including in evolutionary biology. The paper presents three case studies of physical explanations in evolutionary biology: a case of adaptation to pressure in deep-sea invertebrates, which illustrates how a physical parameter imposes selective pressures that organisms adapt to by changing their own physical properties; the case of water viscosity and the evolution of multicellularity, which shows how a global change in a physical parameter is thought to have triggered a macroevolutionary event; and the case of quantum tunnelling in respiration, which shows how quantum physics is relevant to the evolution of sex in eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBiologyAnimalsInvertebratesViscosityAutonomyBiologyEvolutionExplanationPhysicsReduction

Identifiers

PMID41313415
PMCPMC12662889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.