ArticleClinical journal of gastroenterology2026
Congenital absence of the portal vein identified following the onset of esophageal-gastric variceal rupture.
Article in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 36-year-old woman with an unremarkable medical history was admitted to our hospital owing to hematemesis. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed F3 esophageal varices and F3 gastric varices with erosions, which were treated with endoscopic injection sclerotherapy with histoacryl. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed that the superior mesenteric vein and splenic vein converged and drained into the inferior vena cava, with no identifiable intrahepatic portal vein branches. Additionally, collateral circulation and thrombosis in the superior mesenteric vein were identified. On the basis of these findings, we diagnosed congenital absence of the portal vein and associated portal hypertension. After treatment for various complications, the patient underwent living donor liver transplantation as a curative treatment. Surgical pathology also supported the diagnosis of portal vein agenesis. Congenital absence of the portal vein is a rare congenital condition, and only one case involving variceal rupture has been reported. There are no established treatment protocols; however, given the pathophysiology, the development of varices is certainly possible. Effective bridging therapy followed by living donor liver transplantation is expected to result in a favorable prognosis. Although the patient remained free from rebleeding for seven months after initial treatment, the absence of portal flow and progression of SMV thrombosis indicated a high risk of recurrence and other complications. After multidisciplinary discussion, living donor liver transplantation was chosen as the most reliable curative treatment compared with endoscopic therapy or shunt surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41313388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.