Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41313365›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025

Efficacy of powdered vancomycin in the prophylaxis of surgical site infections in posterior thoracic and/or lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis.

Andréa Fortes Carvalho Barreto, João Henrique Carvalho de Jesus, José Calasans Dos Santos, Bruno Fernandes de Oliveira Santos

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andréa Fortes Carvalho BarretoUniversidade Tiradentes, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4656-6585
João Henrique Carvalho de JesusUniversidade Tiradentes, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6654-038X
José Calasans Dos SantosDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Unimed Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil.
Bruno Fernandes de Oliveira SantosHealth Sciences Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil. brunofernandes.se@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0101-2815

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical site infections (SSIs) occur in 1-14% of spine surgeries, especially thoracic procedures, with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as a primary pathogen. Due to antibiotic resistance concerns, powdered vancomycin application offers a promising alternative by providing high local concentrations with minimal systemic effects. Despite its potential, efficacy evidence remains controversial, with concerns about side effects and resistance development. This PRISMA-guided systematic review evaluates powdered vancomycin's effectiveness in preventing SSIs in posterior thoracic and lumbar spine surgeries through analysis of randomized clinical trials. This meta-analysis evaluated powdered vancomycin in preventing surgical site infections in posterior thoracic/lumbar spine surgeries using the PICO framework. The study included randomized trials comparing topical vancomycin to standard techniques, with searches conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases through 2024. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. The analysis utilized RevMan

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisLumbar VertebraeSurgical Wound InfectionThoracic VertebraeVancomycinHumansPowdersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsPowdersVancomycinLumbar vertebraeSurgerySurgical wound infection.Thoracic vertebraeVancomycin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.