Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41313297›Full record

ArticleJACC. Case reports2026

Optimizing Pacemaker Based Heart Rate in a Patient With Severe Aortic Regurgitation and Mitral Regurgitation.

Hope A Caughron, Nelson B Schiller, William Grossman, Daniel P Morin

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hope A CaughronDivision of Cardiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Nelson B SchillerDivision of Cardiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
William GrossmanDivision of Cardiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Daniel P MorinDivision of Cardiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. Electronic address: daniel.morin@ucsf.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData are limited on the optimal heart rate (HR) in patients with pacemakers and volume loading conditions such as severe aortic regurgitation (AR) or mitral regurgitation (MR) who cannot undergo, or decline, surgical/procedural valve intervention. CASE SUMMARY: A 93-year-old man with remote bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement, mitral regurgitation with a prior mitral clip, sinus node dysfunction, and a dual-chamber pacemaker presented with shortness of breath and was found to have severe AR and moderate MR. A ramp echocardiography-driven HR protocol was used to identify 70 beats/min as his optimal HR to minimize AR and MR and improve cardiac output. DISCUSSION: The optimal HR for patients with volume loading conditions such as severe AR or MR can be determined on an individual basis through serial modulation of the paced HR. It is not necessarily the case that a progressively faster HR results in improved hemodynamic parameters. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: HR modification in patients with chronotropic incompetence and pacemakers can improve cardiac output, particularly in patients with valvular lesions. An echocardiography-guided HR titration protocol should be considered for patients with volume loading conditions such as severe AR or MR to determine a patient-specific optimal HR.

Indexed as

aortic regurgitationcardiac outputechocardiographicheart ratemitral regurgitationnonsurgical managementpacemakerpacingsinus node dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID41313297
PMCPMC12926210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.