ArticleAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2025
Latent motivational profiles of behavioral regulations for drinking distinguish groups by alcohol consumption and consequences.
Article in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSelf-determination theory characterizes drinking motives according to level of autonomy and locus of control and aligns with harm reduction approaches to alcohol use. This study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify motivational profiles of self-determined behavioral regulations for drinking and to test their associations with sociodemographic variables and alcohol consumption and outcomes.
methodsAdults aged 18-57 (N = 630, M
resultsA four-profile model fit best. The "Aimless Drinkers" profile (n = 75, 11.9%) had low intrinsic regulation (e.g., enjoyment of drinking) and was disproportionately male (ORs = 2.35-2.65). The "Pleasure Drinker" profile (n = 114, 18.1%) had average intrinsic and low other regulations and was significantly older (OR = 1.07) than the "Externally Controlled Drinker" profile (n = 177, 28.1%), which had high external regulation (e.g., drinking due to social pressure). Externally controlled drinkers reported greater drinking intensity (M
conclusionsOlder individuals were more likely to drink due to intrinsic enjoyment, which may reflect a shift toward greater autonomy over alcohol consumption with increasing age. Drinking primarily for enjoyment also facilitated more positive drinking outcomes. Future research should investigate whether motivational profiles of behavioral regulations for drinking predict long-term trajectories of alcohol consumption and alcohol-related risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.