ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025
Validity and Reliability of an On-Bike Sensor System for the Determination of Aerodynamic Drag in Cycling.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validity and Reliability of an On-Bike Sensor System for the Determination of Aerodynamic Drag in Cycling.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cycling performance is strongly influenced by aerodynamics, with most resistive drag forces being attributed to the rider. The Body Rocket device (BR) is an on-bike sensor system that uses the same load cell technology as a wind tunnel, directly measuring real-time aerodynamic resistance (CdA) from the rider. This study aimed to measure the validity and reliability of CdA measures from BR in two experiments. In Experiment 1, validity of BR was assessed in wind tunnel with a rod and discs of known diameter attached to the end change CdA by a known amount. Experiment 2, examined the validity and reliability of BR in a 250m indoor velodrome. Ten cyclists performed 7 identical efforts at ∼40 km/h for 10 laps of the velodrome, the first 4 to assess validity with the same rod and discs used in the wind tunnel, with the remaining 3 without changes in resistance or the riders changing position to assess reliability. Validity results demonstrated BR measured CdA to be strongly correlated with calculated CdA from the disc addition (r = 0.99), with the smallest identified changes being 0.002 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.