ArticleDermatology reports2026
Epidemiology of keloids among university students in Uganda.
Article in Dermatology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keloids are benign yet persistent fibroproliferative disorders characterized by raised, irregular scars that extend beyond the original wound margins. In addition to causing disfiguring scars, pain, and restricted mobility, keloids significantly impact psychosocial well-being, often leading to emotional distress and socioeconomic challenges for the affected individuals. Although keloids are recognized as being most prevalent among individuals of African descent, there remains a paucity of epidemiological data on their prevalence in African populations. This gap in knowledge has contributed to the limited prioritization of keloid management in healthcare policies and treatment strategies. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of keloids among university students in Uganda and analyze the demographic and patient-related factors associated with keloid development, with particular focus on age, sex, ethnicity, family history, blood group, and skin complexion. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among 502 university students at Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and direct visual inspection of scars by trained research assistants. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the prevalence and evaluate the associations between keloids and participant characteristics. The prevalence of keloids among study participants was 4.18%, while hypertrophic scars were observed in 20.32%. A positive family history was identified as the strongest association with keloid development. No significant associations were found between keloid formation and ethnicity, blood group, or skin complexion. The study provides population-based prevalence data on keloids and emphasizes the role of genetic predisposition in keloid formation. The findings underscore the need for increased awareness, identification of at-risk populations, and strategized preventive interventions for keloid development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.