Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41313085›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2026

Bottom-Up Ice Growth Geometry Attenuates Shear Stress and Improves the Cryopreservation of Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells Under Low DMSO Concentrations.

Rafaela Ouro Neves, Pedro Sena Rego, Marta H G Costa, Isabel Bogalho, Andreia Duarte, Claúdia L da Silva, Frederico Castelo Ferreira, Vitor Geraldes, Miguel A Rodrigues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rafaela Ouro NevesSmartFreez, Ed. Inovação II, Incubadora do Taguspark, Porto Salvo, Portugal.
Pedro Sena RegoSmartFreez, Ed. Inovação II, Incubadora do Taguspark, Porto Salvo, Portugal.
Marta H G CostaDepartment of Bioengineering and Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences (iBB), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Isabel BogalhoDepartment of Bioengineering and Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences (iBB), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Andreia DuarteSmartFreez, Ed. Inovação II, Incubadora do Taguspark, Porto Salvo, Portugal.
Claúdia L da SilvaDepartment of Bioengineering and Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences (iBB), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Frederico Castelo FerreiraDepartment of Bioengineering and Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences (iBB), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Vitor GeraldesSmartFreez, Ed. Inovação II, Incubadora do Taguspark, Porto Salvo, Portugal.
Miguel A RodriguesSmartFreez, Ed. Inovação II, Incubadora do Taguspark, Porto Salvo, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on cell cryopreservation have been limited by the complexity of the freezing process and challenges on controlling ice formation, managing cooling rates, and optimizing cryoprotectant concentrations. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of bottom-up and conventional radial freezing on the viability of mammalian cells, using mouse hybridoma cells and human umbilical cord blood (hUCB) derived mononuclear cells (MNCs) as models. UCB-derived MNCs were selected for this study because these contain hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), which hold significant clinical relevance. The study combines experimental assays, including cell viability assays and flow cytometry characterization, with Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) simulations. A bottom-up freezing geometry sustained high cell viability, even at dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) concentrations below 5% (v/v), whereas conventional radial freezing led to lower cell viability when DMSO is used below such concentrations threshold. This observation is particularly relevant for cell-based therapies. CFD simulations for conventional radial freezing elucidated that for such method the ice formed at the top of the vial is of high porosity for media with 10% (v/v) DMSO, but of low porosity for lower DMSO concentrations. The simulations show that the latter conditions can result in an increase in shear stress on cells, by up to an order of magnitude. Overall, this study provides a rational for 10% (v/v) DMSO being the optimal reported concentration for conventional freezing methods, as a result of poor control of ice growth direction and higher mechanical stresses at lower DMSO concentrations. Experimental results show that bottom-up freezing method, using only 2.5% (v/v) DMSO, allow to reach cell viabilities as high as the ones obtained with conventional radial freezing protocols at 10% (v/v) DMSO. In addition, bottom-up freezing method with 2.5% DMSO preserves the clonogenic potential of HSPCs within hUCB-derived MNCs comparably to conventional radial freezing protocol with 10% DMSO. Importantly, the results support the recommendation to use cell cryopreservation strategies, such as bottom-up freezing, that enable the use of lower DMSO concentrations by controlling the direction of heat transfer.

Indexed as

CryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsDimethyl SulfoxideHematopoietic Stem CellsIceAnimalsCell SurvivalHumansMiceStress, MechanicalCryoprotective AgentsDimethyl SulfoxideIcebottom‐up ice growthcomputational fluid dynamicscryopreservationDMSOfreezing geometryhematopoietic stem/progenitor cells

Identifiers

PMID41313085
PMCPMC12883897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.