ArticleJournal of water and health2025
Trends of adenovirus occurrence in drinking and wastewater treatment plants of the city of Hamadan, Iran.
Article in Journal of water and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite significant advancements in water treatment, waterborne disease outbreaks are being reported from across the globe. A total of 29 source and treated water samples from the two drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs), and 32 influent and effluent water samples from the municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) were collected in the city of Hamadan, Iran. In addition, eight municipal sewage samples were collected. The samples were concentrated by polyethylene glycol precipitation, and nucleic acids were extracted and assayed for Adv using standard PCR, nested PCR and real-time PCR targeting the hexon gene. More than half (55.1%) of the samples tested positive for AdV by at least one of the detection methods. In the WWTP, 63.6% of influent and 80% of effluent samples tested positive, indicating ineffective viral removal during the treatment process. Whereas, in the DWTPs, 50% of source and 28.6% of treated water samples tested positive, indicating a more effective viral removal by the DWTP. Among the molecular techniques employed, nested PCR demonstrated superior sensitivity. The study identifies the trend of adenovirus occurrence and the effective methods for determining their prevalence and the potential risk of viral exposure from the municipal water systems in the city of Hamadan, Iran.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41312980What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.