ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025
Breast Cancer in Kazakhstan, 2004-2023: Successful Mortality Reduction Driven by Organized Screening and Stage Shift.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of Early-Stage Breast Cancer Presentation in Western Kazakhstan: A Population-Based Analysis of Urban-Rural Disparities and Diagnostic Pathways (2015-2025).Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a National Breast Cancer Screening Program in a Middle-Income Country: The Case of Kazakhstan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo quantify two-decade national trends in the breast cancer burden in Kazakhstan and evaluate the performance of the organized mammography screening programme-including stage distribution and regional heterogeneity after its scale-up.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, population-based evaluation using national registry and screening data. Population indicators (incidence, mortality, years of potential life lost) were analysed for 2004-2023; screening performance (coverage, abnormal rate, cancer detection rate, positive predictive value, benign biopsy rate, number needed to screen, programme contribution) was assessed for 2010-2023. Trends were modelled with Joinpoint; staging followed TNM (I-II "early", III-IV "advanced").
resultsASIR increased from 39.3 per 100,000 women in 2004 to 54.4 in 2023 (with a transient dip to 44.9 in 2020), whereas ASMR declined from 16.6 to 10.2 per 100,000 over the same interval; the mortality-to-incidence ratio decreased from 0.42 to 0.19. YPLL_75 fell from 175.1 per 100,000 in 2004 to a nadir of 76.0 in 2018, then measured 104.9 in 2023. The proportion diagnosed at stages I-II rose from 71.1% (2010) to 88.6% (2023), with corresponding declines in stage III (22.2% → 8.7%) and stage IV (6.8% → 5.1%). Following the expansion of eligibility to ages 40-70 (from 2018), screening throughput and coverage increased, but performance remained heterogeneous across regions, with variability in recall rates, detection yield, and downstream diagnostic pathways.
conclusionAcross 2004-2023, Kazakhstan experienced a favourable divergence between rising incidence and falling mortality, substantial reductions in premature mortality, and a marked shift toward earlier-stage diagnosis. These gains coincide with the maturation of the organised screening programme and broader system improvements. Consolidation will require targeted, region-specific quality-improvement bundles and resilience strategies to protect screening coverage and diagnostic capacity during system shocks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.