ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025
Comparison of Dose-Volume Histograms of Three Whole Breast Radiotherapy Regimes: Conventional, Normal Hypofractionation and FAST-FORWARD Hypofractionation.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to compare dose-volume histograms of three whole breast radiotherapy regimes there are: conventional radiotherapy (CRT), normal hypofractionation (NHRT) and FAST-FORWARD hypofractionation radiotherapy (FFRT).
methodsThis retrospective single-center study was conducted in the radiotherapy department of Vasei Hospital in Sabzevar, Iran in 2024. The therapeutic dose for the chest/whole breast and regional lymph nodes was administered using CRT (50Gy/2Gy/25Fx), NHRT (42.56Gy/2.66Gy/16Fx), and FFRT (26Gy/5.2Gy/5Fx) regimens.
resultsThe results of this study showed no statistically significant difference in the average scores of PTV V95%, PTV V107-110%, conformity index, and homogeneity index among the CRT, NHRT and FFRT treatment regimens. However, the average scores of PTV Dmean, lung Vmean, and heart Vmean were significantly higher for CRT and NHRT relative to FFRT group.
conclusionThe CRT is not superior to the NHRT and FFRT regimes, and in some cases, especially NHRT, they can be used interchangeably in the unique conditions and crowded government medical centers to provide more treatment services to patients and lower financial burden to the healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.