ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026
Examining the influence of lifestyle variables on the accuracy of skeletal age estimation via the pubic symphysis.
Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Examining the influence of lifestyle variables on the accuracy of skeletal age estimation via the pubic symphysis.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated links between skeletal age estimation error and lifestyle variables to better elucidate sources of interpersonal variability in the rates of skeletal aging. Skeletal age for 180 individuals from the New Mexico Decedent Image Database was estimated by applying the Suchey-Brooks method and transition analysis to 3D models of the pubic symphysis, and age estimates were compared to known age-at-death. Age estimation bias and accuracy for both methods were evaluated first with respect to single lifestyle variables, then random forest modeling was used to test variability with respect to all lifestyle variables. Age estimation bias was shown to be significantly different with respect to sex when applying transition analysis, but not when applying Suchey-Brooks, and males tended to be underaged relative to females of the same age. While no statistically significant differences in bias existed for either method between BMI categories, random forest modeling indicated that body size exerts a limited but variable influence on skeletal aging. Additional variables were highlighted as potentially influential to skeletal aging by random forests, such as socioeconomic status, but ultimately, model performance and variable importance plots demonstrated that these influences were slight and nonuniform. These data suggest that including considerations of lifestyle variables in skeletal aging methods would not improve aging estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.