ArticleEpilepsia2026
Proposed criteria of levels of evidence for co-occurring epilepsy in people with functional/dissociative seizures.
Article in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis work was undertaken to describe the level of evidence for co-occurring epileptic seizures in patients with known functional/dissociative seizures (FDS) using stratification criteria analogous to the International League Against Epilepsy criteria for functional seizures.
methodsAdult patients (age
resultsWe identified 460 patients with FDS (median age = 34 years, interquartile range = 24-46 years, 78% female). The majority (62.6%, 95% confidence interval = 58%-67%) had "unlikely" co-occurring epilepsy due to no "red flags." Some (11.5%) patients had high likelihood of co-occurring epilepsy: 10.2% electroencephalographically "documented" and 1.3% "clinically established." There were 74 (16.5%) patients with neurodiagnostic "red flags" indicating "probable" co-occurring epilepsy. The remaining 9.3% had historical reports of "red flags" indicating "possible" co-occurring epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: The majority (62.6%) of people with FDS were "unlikely" to have co-occurring epilepsy due to the lack of "red flags." Conversely, 11.5% of patients with FDS had a high level of certainty of co-occurring epileptic seizures (clinically established and documented). In patients with intermediate concern, patient-centered decision-making can guide the next steps of diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.