Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41312735›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of oncology2026

[Corrigendum] RIPK4/PEBP1 axis promotes pancreatic cancer cell migration and invasion by activating RAF1/MEK/ERK signaling.

Zi-Hao Qi, Hua-Xiang Xu, Shi-Rong Zhang, Jin-Zhi Xu, Shuo Li, He-Li Gao, Wei Jin, Wen-Quan Wang, Chun-Tao Wu, Quan-Xing Ni and 2 more

Abstract readPublished Erratum
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zi-Hao QiDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Hua-Xiang XuDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Shi-Rong ZhangDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Jin-Zhi XuDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Shuo LiDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
He-Li GaoDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Wei JinDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Wen-Quan WangDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Chun-Tao WuDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Quan-Xing NiDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Xian-Jun YuDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Liang LiuDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the publication of the above paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by an interested reader that the middle and right‑hand protein blots shown for the RIPK4 data in Fig. 2B (relating to the PANC‑1‑Rsh1 and PANC‑1‑Rsh2 experiments) were strikingly similar to western blot data shown in Fig. 3B for the RAF‑1 data (and the same PANC‑1‑Rsh1 and PANC‑1‑Rsh2 experiments), albeit the bands were presented with different exposures/a change in contrast, also with apparent horizontal flipping and vertical resizing. Upon contacting the authors, they realized that errors had been made during the assembly of the experimental images presented in Fig. 3B. These errors were likely to have resulted from oversights made during the process of data consolidation and figure assembly; specifically, this led to the inadvertent use of incorrect images for the RAF‑1 western blot results in both the PANC‑1 cell line (as was correctly identified by the interested reader on PubPeer) and in the Capan‑1 cell line (which the authors identified themselves upon performing their own subsequent review). The authors were also able to present photos of the raw, unedited versions of the gels to the Editorial Office. A revised version of Fig. 3, now showing the correct data for the RAF‑1 blots for both the PANC‑1 and Capan‑1 cell lines, as specified above, is shown on the next page. The authors confirm that the errors made in assembling Fig. 3 did not have a major impact on the conclusions reported in the above article, and they thank the Editor of

Indexed as

pancreatic cancerphosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1RAF1/MEK/ERK pathwayreceptor-interacting protein kinase 4tumor metastasis

Identifiers

PMID41312735
PMCPMC12674195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.