ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Rivers and roads, silence and songs: female crickets respond similarly to conspecific male song in natural and anthropogenic soundscapes.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rivers and roads, silence and songs: female crickets respond similarly to conspecific male song in natural and anthropogenic soundscapes.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many studies have demonstrated that anthropogenic noise affects animals' auditory perception of salient stimuli. Few have tested whether these effects are different from those experienced in nature. We tested the ability of female field crickets, Teleogryllus oceanicus, to phonotactically locate a speaker playing conspecific male song in four acoustic backgrounds: silence, road noise, river noise and heterospecific song. Crickets approaching conspecific song paused more frequently in river noise and heterospecific song treatments compared with silence or road noise. We also recorded auditory interneuron (AN1 and AN2) activity under the first three acoustic background treatments to construct and compare treatment-specific audiograms and interneuron responses to conspecific song. We found little difference in activity, other than that AN2 thresholds for 6 kHz sounds (the tested frequency closest to male song) were highest in river noise, while heterospecific song increased baseline AN2 activity and reduced AN2 activity to conspecific song onset. Our results suggest road noise is not necessarily a greater disturbance than river noise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.