ArticleThe British journal of clinical psychology2026
Professionals' and non-professionals' experiences of working with people with Hoarding Disorder: A thematic synthesis.
Article in The British journal of clinical psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIndividuals with Hoarding Disorder can encounter a range of professionals and non-professionals during the course of receiving support to manage the accumulation of belongings. This thematic synthesis explored the experiences of professionals and non-professionals working with people with Hoarding Disorder.
methodsPsycInfo, Embase and PubMed databases were searched in October 2023. Published and unpublished studies were included. Search terms covered various helping professions including volunteer support, and qualitative designs, in relation to Hoarding Disorder. This identified 12 studies. All text within the study 'Results' or 'Findings' section was extracted for data synthesis to capture both author interpretations and participant quotations (mixed method studies extracted qualitative data only). Data were coded 'line by line', which led to descriptive themes being created followed by analytical themes.
resultsFour themes were identified: (1) Relationships are Complex; (2) Possessions are Just the Tip of the Iceberg; (3) Juggling Dilemmas on a Tightrope; and (4) Working with Hoarding is Like a Puzzle to Solve. Twelve subthemes were also identified. These themes described the various challenges involved in working with Hoarding Disorder, including the role of relationships with services and others, comorbidities, such as trauma and executive dysfunction, the ethical dilemmas which are apparent during the work, and the differing perceptions of working with Hoarding Disorder.
conclusionsThis thematic synthesis identifies common challenges involved in working with Hoarding Disorder and offers recommendations as to how professionals and non-professionals can approach their work with this client group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.