ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Beef Tallow-Based Skincare Claims in Social Media: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beef Tallow-Based Skincare Claims in Social Media: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBeef tallow, or "tallow", is a solid fat derived from animals with a high content of triglycerides and essential fatty acids. Tallow has gained popularity as a skincare product on social media in recent years, driven by the increasing demand for natural and sustainable beauty solutions. There are few studies investigating tallow as a skincare ingredient and its effects on dermatological conditions.
aimsTo promote responsible use of tallow by characterizing information about tallow on social media platforms, examining the quality of claims made in the context of available evidence, and evaluating areas of financial bias.
methodsSocial media posts from various platforms (YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok) were evaluated in a cross-sectional analysis to assess claims about tallow-related skin care, the quality of information provided, and potential financial biases.
resultsClaims of efficacy for acne, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis were prevalent but largely lacked cited evidence. The majority of the posts promoting beef tallow across platforms demonstrated financial bias and were uploaded by individuals lacking credentials in healthcare. Additionally, most existing evidence for tallow use is based on studies examining its ingredients.
conclusionDespite growing anecdotal claims that beef tallow benefits skincare and dermatologic conditions, evidence remains insufficient to support these claims. Many promotions of beef tallow for skin care are associated with financial bias. Further research is needed to evaluate its long-term effects, ideal formulations, and suitability for different skin conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.