Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41312530›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical health & safety2025

What's in the Powder? Evaluating Fentanyl Test Strip Sensitivity to Common Household Items in Chemical Emergency Response Scenarios.

Kate Y Mongold, Meshel A Lange, Mason Shields, Heather M Barkholtz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical health & safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kate Y MongoldForensic Toxicology, Environmental Health Division, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, 2601 Agriculture Dr., Madison, Wisconsin 53718, United States.
Meshel A LangeChemical Emergency Response, Environmental Health Division, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, 2601 Agriculture Dr., Madison, Wisconsin 53718, United States.
Mason ShieldsChemical Emergency Response, Environmental Health Division, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, 2601 Agriculture Dr., Madison, Wisconsin 53718, United States.
Heather M BarkholtzForensic Toxicology, Environmental Health Division, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, 2601 Agriculture Dr., Madison, Wisconsin 53718, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7997-7567

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of opioid misuse, particularly the adulteration of illicit substances with fentanyl, has heightened the need for effective field detection methods for unknown powders. First responders, including chemical emergency response and Hazardous Materials (HazMat) teams, face significant challenges in assessing chemical threats in real-time without the resources of a controlled laboratory environment. Immunoassay test strips are commonly used for drug detection and are considered potential tools for identifying fentanyl in emergency scenarios. However, the impact of common diluents (substances such as sugar, flour, and other commonplace additives) on the accuracy of these test strips is unexplored. This study evaluates the limit of detection (LOD) of a popular commercially available fentanyl test strip (FTS) in the presence of various diluents commonly found in emergency situations. The experimental LOD was determined to be 0.05 μg/mL, significantly lower than the reported LOD of 0.20 μg/mL. While no false positives were observed with diluents alone, the presence of diluents in fentanyl solutions altered FTS results, requiring higher concentrations of fentanyl to achieve a positive reading. Results were often difficult to interpret, particularly near the LOD, which could pose challenges for first responders in real-world scenarios. This work is the first to assess the application of FTS to chemical emergency response situations and threat assessment of unknown powders. Commercially available FTS are cost-effective, user-friendly, provide rapid results, and detect low concentrations of fentanyl even in the presence of other substances.

Indexed as

diluentsfentanylimmunoassay test stripslimit of detectionunknown powder testing

Identifiers

PMID41312530
PMCPMC12648642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.