ArticleJournal of chemical health & safety2025
What's in the Powder? Evaluating Fentanyl Test Strip Sensitivity to Common Household Items in Chemical Emergency Response Scenarios.
Article in Journal of chemical health & safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of opioid misuse, particularly the adulteration of illicit substances with fentanyl, has heightened the need for effective field detection methods for unknown powders. First responders, including chemical emergency response and Hazardous Materials (HazMat) teams, face significant challenges in assessing chemical threats in real-time without the resources of a controlled laboratory environment. Immunoassay test strips are commonly used for drug detection and are considered potential tools for identifying fentanyl in emergency scenarios. However, the impact of common diluents (substances such as sugar, flour, and other commonplace additives) on the accuracy of these test strips is unexplored. This study evaluates the limit of detection (LOD) of a popular commercially available fentanyl test strip (FTS) in the presence of various diluents commonly found in emergency situations. The experimental LOD was determined to be 0.05 μg/mL, significantly lower than the reported LOD of 0.20 μg/mL. While no false positives were observed with diluents alone, the presence of diluents in fentanyl solutions altered FTS results, requiring higher concentrations of fentanyl to achieve a positive reading. Results were often difficult to interpret, particularly near the LOD, which could pose challenges for first responders in real-world scenarios. This work is the first to assess the application of FTS to chemical emergency response situations and threat assessment of unknown powders. Commercially available FTS are cost-effective, user-friendly, provide rapid results, and detect low concentrations of fentanyl even in the presence of other substances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.