ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
A Retrospective Application of Deep Sternal Wound Dehiscence and Malunion Risk Scores on Sternal Nonunion Patients.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: More than 750,000 median sternotomies are performed annually in the United States, with wire cerclage as the standard closure technique. However, cerclage may not ensure optimal stability in high-risk patients, leading to complications such as dehiscence, mediastinitis, and nonunion. Sternal rigid plate fixation offers improved outcomes but remains underused, in part, due to a lack of clear indications. Recent risk models quantify the risk of sternal dehiscence, but have not been validated to guide closure decisions. We evaluated 2 risk calculators to guide prophylactic plating decisions and identified overlooked risk factors. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients referred to a single plastic surgeon for symptomatic sternal nonunion between 2017 and 2024. Demographics, comorbidities, and surgical outcomes were collected, and 2 risk-score calculators for deep sternal wound infection and malunion were assessed. Results: Forty-six patients with symptomatic sternal nonunion were identified. Comorbidities were prevalent, including diabetes (56.52%), obstructive sleep apnea and gastroesophageal reflux disease (54.25% each), and chronic kidney disease (36.9%). Postdischarge, 43.48% reported coughing-related sternal pain, and 34.78% reported poor compliance with sternal precautions. The deep sternal wound infection calculator recommended plating for 13 patients, whereas the malunion risk score recommended it for 24 patients, with only 10 patients recommended for plating by both systems. Conclusions: Current risk calculators may overlook critical patient factors, limiting their predictive accuracy for sternal complications. These findings highlight the need for more comprehensive risk assessment tools to improve patient selection for prophylactic sternal rigid plate fixation and optimize sternal closure techniques.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.