Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41312483›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

V.T.O.B.S.-Learning birth mechanics in virtual reality: a controlled cohort study in undergraduate medical education.

Jana Adams, Christiane Klein, Sebastian Ludwig, Christoph Stosch, Kristina Vogel, Nicola H Bauer, Christiane J Bruns, Rabi R Datta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jana AdamsDepartment of Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christiane KleinDepartment of General-, Visceral-, Thoracic- and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sebastian LudwigDepartment of Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christoph StoschCologne Interprofessional Skills-Lab and Simulation Centre, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Kristina VogelInstitute of Midwifery Science, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Nicola H BauerInstitute of Midwifery Science, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christiane J BrunsDepartment of General-, Visceral-, Thoracic- and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Rabi R DattaDepartment of General-, Visceral-, Thoracic- and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly applied in medical education to enhance learning and patient care. Teaching birth mechanics poses particular challenges, as students must understand complex, dynamic, and rotating intrauterine processes that traditional models cannot adequately represent. VR offers immersive, interactive visualization and has shown promise in other fields, but its role in obstetrics remains underexplored. This study evaluated a novel VR module (Virtual Training for Obstetric Birth Simulation, V.T.O.B.S.) for undergraduate obstetrics education. Methods: In this single-center study, 46 medical students used V.T.O.B.S. during their obstetrical block internship and were compared with 120 students without VR exposure (non-equivalent intervention group design). The module consisted of a single, self-directed session. Knowledge retention was assessed 11-17 weeks later in a theoretical Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) station consisting mainly of image-based questions on birth mechanics. Secondary outcomes included acceptance, motion sickness, and free-text feedback. Results: No significant differences were found in long-term scores of the OSCE study station between VR and control groups. Subgroup analyses showed no consistent effects, except that visual impairment was associated with significantly lower performance (median 13 [IQR 11-15] vs. 14.5 [12-16], Discussion: Although no significant knowledge gain was demonstrated, the strong acceptance and usability support the feasibility of VR in undergraduate obstetrics curricula. The absence of measurable effects may relate to the broad learning objective, brief OSCE assessment, single self-directed exposure, and heterogeneous timing between intervention and assessment. V.T.O.B.S. nonetheless represents an innovative educational tool addressing curricular gaps in visualizing dynamic birth mechanics. Future research should explore repeated exposures, assessment formats that directly capture spatial-conceptual understanding, and integration into interprofessional formats for medical and midwifery students as well as postgraduate training.

Indexed as

birth mechanicsmedical educationmedical studentsobstetricsvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41312483
PMCPMC12647056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.