Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41312453›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

Allogeneic whole-eye transplantation: advancements, challenges, and future directions in vision restoration.

Lingxi Wei, Wenqi Yan, Kai Zhang, Fei Gao, Zhuoling Li, Ruonan Pan, Zhengwei Zhang, Xiaogang Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lingxi WeiShanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Wenqi YanShandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Kai ZhangShanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Fei GaoShanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Zhuoling LiShanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Ruonan PanShanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Zhengwei ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wuxi Clinical College, Nantong University, Wuxi, China.
Xiaogang WangDepartment of Cataract, Shanxi Eye Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision loss remains a significant global health burden, primarily driven by irreversible ocular conditions such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), glaucoma, severe ocular trauma, and intraocular malignancies. Despite advances in retinal prosthetics and stem cell-based therapies, current treatment options are still limited in their ability to fully restore visual function. Allogeneic whole-eye transplantation (WET) has recently gained attention as a novel and potentially transformative strategy for vision restoration. This review synthesizes recent progress in the field, including advancements in microsurgical techniques, immunosuppressive protocols, and neural integration strategies, drawing on evidence from both preclinical animal models and emerging human studies. Key components, including optic nerve (ON) regeneration, vascular anastomosis, immune tolerance, and donor-recipient matching, are critically examined. Furthermore, we address ongoing barriers, including graft viability, chronic rejection, central visual pathway rewiring, and ethical considerations surrounding the procurement of donor eyes. While substantial milestones have been achieved, particularly in experimental settings, clinical translation remains in its early stages. This review highlights current limitations and proposes future directions for multidisciplinary research aimed at overcoming these challenges and advancing WET toward clinical reality.

Indexed as

allogeneicchallengesprogressvision losswhole-eye transplantation

Identifiers

PMID41312453
PMCPMC12648389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.