ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2026
Prediction model to identify patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome using real-world data.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence and prevalence of hypereosinophilic syndrome in the United States: A retrospective claims database study.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2026Article
- The Clinical Burden of Hypereosinophilic Syndrome in a Large United States Cohort.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is challenging to diagnose and identify in real-world data. Objective: We sought to develop a machine learning model to predict HES diagnosis in secondary data and estimate HES prevalence among individuals with elevated blood eosinophil count (BEC). Methods: Open medical/pharmacy claims were used to develop a prediction model, including patients with ≥1 HES diagnosis code and ≥1 elevated BEC (>1,000 cells/μL), and non-HES controls with elevated BEC. Candidate predictors for HES diagnosis included demographics, disease manifestations, treatments, health care utilization, and procedures. A generalized linear mixed model with a binomial distribution and logit link function was used to construct the model. Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation. Results: A total of 260 patients with a HES diagnosis and 157,718 non-HES controls with elevated BEC were included. Predictors with the largest coefficients included bone marrow biopsy, eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and autoimmune disease of the digestive system. The final model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 and area under the precision recall curve of 0.83. After applying the model (0.7 predicted probability threshold), 6,233 patients with predicted HES were identified. These patients exhibited similar characteristics to patients with a HES diagnosis code. With this threshold, the prevalence of predicted HES and total HES (diagnosed plus predicted) was 5.30% and 5.65%, respectively, among those with an elevated BEC. Conclusion: A machine learning prediction model identified a substantial number of patients with predicted HES, suggesting that the actual prevalence of HES may be significantly underestimated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.