Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41312450›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2026

Prediction model to identify patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome using real-world data.

Paneez Khoury, Yen Chung, Donna Carstens, Erin E Cook, Fan Mu, Mu Cheng, Elizabeth Judson, Jingyi Chen, Travis Wang, Zhuo Chen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Clinical Burden of Hypereosinophilic Syndrome in a Large United States Cohort.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Paneez KhouryNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Md.
Yen ChungAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, Del.
Donna CarstensAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, Del.
Erin E CookAnalysis Group Inc, Boston, Mass.
Fan MuAnalysis Group Inc, Boston, Mass.
Mu ChengAnalysis Group Inc, Boston, Mass.
Elizabeth JudsonAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, Del.
Jingyi ChenAnalysis Group Inc, Boston, Mass.
Travis WangAnalysis Group Inc, Boston, Mass.
Zhuo ChenAnalysis Group Inc, Boston, Mass.
Princess U OgboguUniversity Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is challenging to diagnose and identify in real-world data. Objective: We sought to develop a machine learning model to predict HES diagnosis in secondary data and estimate HES prevalence among individuals with elevated blood eosinophil count (BEC). Methods: Open medical/pharmacy claims were used to develop a prediction model, including patients with ≥1 HES diagnosis code and ≥1 elevated BEC (>1,000 cells/μL), and non-HES controls with elevated BEC. Candidate predictors for HES diagnosis included demographics, disease manifestations, treatments, health care utilization, and procedures. A generalized linear mixed model with a binomial distribution and logit link function was used to construct the model. Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation. Results: A total of 260 patients with a HES diagnosis and 157,718 non-HES controls with elevated BEC were included. Predictors with the largest coefficients included bone marrow biopsy, eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and autoimmune disease of the digestive system. The final model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 and area under the precision recall curve of 0.83. After applying the model (0.7 predicted probability threshold), 6,233 patients with predicted HES were identified. These patients exhibited similar characteristics to patients with a HES diagnosis code. With this threshold, the prevalence of predicted HES and total HES (diagnosed plus predicted) was 5.30% and 5.65%, respectively, among those with an elevated BEC. Conclusion: A machine learning prediction model identified a substantial number of patients with predicted HES, suggesting that the actual prevalence of HES may be significantly underestimated.

Indexed as

Hypereosinophilic syndromemachine learningprediction modelprevalence

Identifiers

PMID41312450
PMCPMC12651482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.