ArticleNeurobiology of sleep and circadian rhythms2025
Chronotype in alpha-tACS: Preliminary evidence hints at sleep quality modulation of aftereffects in evening types in the morning.
Article in Neurobiology of sleep and circadian rhythms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a promising tool for research on oscillatory brain activity, yet both behavioral and electrophysiological outcome measures show high variability across studies. One source for this variability might be chronotype and an incidental mismatch between chronotype and the time of the measurement. 14 evening type and 14 morning type participants performed a sustained attention task - once at their chronotypically optimal and once at a non-optimal time of day. TACS was applied for 20 min at the individual alpha frequency over two electrodes located at Cz and Oz. EEG was recorded for 10 min prior to and after stimulation. Sleep timing and quality were assessed with a sleep questionnaire. While planned analyses failed to find effects of stimulation and session timing on alpha power, exploratory analyses revealed that below average sleep quality in evening types in the morning was associated with no changes or unexpected decreases in alpha power after stimulation. Effects of sleep quality were present in the morning for evening types, but neither in the evening session nor in morning types. It is suggested that this effect of sleep quality reflects increased sleepiness, which could impede expected aftereffects of tACS. It is likely that effects of sleepiness might be especially relevant when people are stimulated at a chronotypically non-optimal time. Due to the exploratory nature of these sleep effects and their presence in only a small subgroup leading to low power and confidence, future systematic sham-controlled studies are needed to clarify the relationship between sleep, time of day and chronotype in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.