ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2025
Experiences, Attitudes, and Practices of Resin Infiltration Use in Finland.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Promotive and Preventive Factors Influencing Adapting of Resin Infiltration: A Qualitative Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim was to investigate the experiences, attitudes, and practices of resin infiltration (RI) among Finnish dentists. Methods: A Webropol-based questionnaire was sent via the Finnish Dental Association's regular newsletter to all members in April 2022. The questionnaire consisted of nine questions on experiences and opinions concerning RI with fixed options for answers. Additionally, methods that respondents had used for arresting initial caries lesions were asked with a possibility to choose several options. Descriptive analyses were performed using frequencies and proportions. For the analyses, respondents were grouped into RI users and nonusers. To analyze the differences between the groups, cross tabulation with Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test were used. Results: Of the 416 respondents, 32.7% answered that RI is included in their selection of procedures. RI was considered an easy procedure by 46.7% of RI users and 19.9% of nonusers ( Conclusions: The attitude of those who use RI in their clinical practice was more positive than that of nonusers. This indicates a need for further promotion of this minimally invasive approach to arresting and treating caries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.